“The increased uncertainty would threaten economic growth, including for agriculture, local economies, and downstream communities,” the White House said. Kyrsten Sinema, an Arizona independent who caucuses with Democrats, did not immediately return a request for comment.īiden would have to sign a rollback, though, and the White House pledged in a March 6 statement of administration policy that he would veto any such measure.Ĭontrary to Republican complaints that the rule would create more uncertainty, the White House said that revoking the rule would only complicate the situation by voiding any working definition. Unlike most legislation in the Senate, the majority party cannot block consideration of a Congressional Review Act resolution.Ī Senate vote is likely sometime in the middle of next week, a Senate Republican aide said Friday.Īll 49 Senate Republicans have signed on to sponsor the resolution and E&E News reported this month Manchin would also support it.Ī spokesman for Montana Democrat Jon Tester, another moderate from a rural state up for reelection next year, said Friday the senator is undecided on the measure.Ī spokeswoman for Sen. With swing-vote Democrat Joe Manchin III apparently in favor, the WOTUS rollback could attract enough support in a nearly evenly divided Senate. Such resolutions need only a simple majority to pass the Senate. Pennsylvania’s Brian Fitzpatrick was the sole Republican to oppose it. The other seven Democrats to vote in favor were Angie Craig of Minnesota, Don Davis of North Carolina, Jared Golden of Maine, Jim Costa and Jimmy Panetta of California, and Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez of Texas. Georgia Democrats David Scott, the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, and Sanford Bishop, the ranking member on the House Appropriations Agriculture Subcommittee, both voted for the resolution. While Republicans were the most vocal in opposing the rule, nine Democrats - including two leaders in agriculture policy - crossed party lines to vote for the resolution. The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers proposed the new definition in late 2021 and the final rule would go into effect on March 20, if it is not halted through congressional action. Republicans used a procedure allowed under the Congressional Review Act, which permits Congress to reject new executive branch rules. The move was largely symbolic, as President Joe Biden has said he intends to veto the measure if it reaches his desk. Environmental Protection Agency’s broader definition of what qualifies as “waters of the United States,” or WOTUS, for the purposes of federal regulation under the Clean Water Act. The chamber approved, 227-198, a resolution to roll back the U.S. House voted Thursday to undo a Biden administration definition of wetlands that allows for regulations on private lands. If our helpline is unable to assist you, we recommend browsing our state-by-state listings of the Best-Rated Rehab Centers, reading our resource guides, or visiting .įor more information on Addiction Helpline America, mission statement visit our About Us Page. We do not receive any commission or fee that is dependent upon which treatment provider a visitor ultimately selects. In some cases, Addiction Helpline America charges our verified partner a modest cost per call, which helps us cover the costs of building and maintaining our website. Our helpline is offered at no cost to you and with no obligation to enter into treatment. Calls are routed based on geographic location. Addiction Helpline America ’s helpline is a private and convenient solution for individuals seeking treatment for addiction or mental illness.Ĭalls to our helpline (all non-facility specific 1-8XX numbers) will be answered by Recovery Advisors, or one of our verified local treatment partners.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |